Legal Opinion

Halsell v. Musgrave

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1893No. 310PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEAD, Associate Justice.

The verdict establishes that in May, 1890, appellant, claiming to be the owner of what was known as the Earhart stock of cattle in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, through her agent, O. T. Love, proposed to trade them to appellee for some of his cattle in the State of Texas. Appellee, however, declined to make this trade, upon the ground that one J. W. Cooper, who was a wealthy and influential stock man, was also claiming the Earhart cattle, and he did not care to become involved in litigation with him. A short time after this, Love again proposed this trade to appellee,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wintz v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. White v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Ranger & Co. v. HearneTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. D. Baker Co. v. SmedleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Parker v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Sargent v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Miller Surfacing Co. v. BridgersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Lomax v. TrullCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API