Legal Opinion

Ranger & Co. v. Hearne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Robertson. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Rector.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

Appellants brought suit on a written contract of sale of a certain engine for $2,000 gold, to defendant, Hearne, the contract containing the following clause: “the said Hearne hereby accepting and receiving the same, having fully and satisfactorily examined it.” • The contract further embodies an agreement by Ranger & Co. to procure for defendant a saw-mill of a certain description, for which he was to pay $1,000 gold, the defendant agreeing to pay the $3,000 in cotton, at eight cents per pound. When forwarded to him at Bryan, defendant refused to receive both engine.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Ranger & Co. v. HearneTexas Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Parker v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Davis v. DriscollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. South Texas Mortgage Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API