Legal Opinion

Myers v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2003No. S-9941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Constitution article IX, section 7 prohibits the legislature from dedicating future revenues directly to any special purpose. But can the legislature sell the state's right to a future revenue stream that is based on a settlement of a lawsuit and then immediately appropriate the proceeds? We conclude that selling the right to receive future revenue from the tobaceo lawsuit settlement involved in the present case is constitutional for three reasons: (1) the legislative appropriation power includes the power to sell state assets, (2) lawsuit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Malone v. MeekinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sonneman v. HickelAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Ports Authority v. ArnallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eric Forrer v. State of Alaska and Lucinda MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Ketchikan Gateway BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Myers v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. American Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API