Legal Opinion
Noah Systems, Inc. v. Intuit Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 9, 2012No. 2011-1390PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
Noah Systems, Inc. (“Noah”) appeals the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”). After construing the disputed terms of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,875,435 (“the '435 patent”), the district court determined that an “access means” limitation in the claims of the '435 patent was indefinite, and, therefore, granted Intuit’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity. Because we agree that the “access means” limitation is indefinite, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Background
This appeal arises out of an action brought by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Media Rights Technologies, Inc. v. Capital One Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Function Media, L.L.C v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.