Legal Opinion
Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided May 10, 2019No. Case No. 6:18-cv-30-JDKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEREMY D. KERNODLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On March 14, 2019, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8,661,361 ("the '361 Patent"), 9,423,938 ("the '938 Patent"), *5939,423,923 ("the '923 Patent"), 9,841,878 ("the '878 Patent"), 9,823,838 ("the '838 Patent"), 9,870,145 ("the '145 Patent"), 9,423,954 ("the '954 Patent"), 8,781,299 ("the '299 Patent"), 8,983,264 ("the '264 Patent"), 9,871,558 ("the '558 Patent"), and 8,787,731 ("the '731 Patent") (collectively, "the Asserted Patents").1 The Court has considered the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- GLASTON CORPORATION v. HHH EQUIPMENT RESOURCESDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Kurin, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020