Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Wells Fargo Realty Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1985No. B003778PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
Introduction
Plaintiffs and appellants Alan and Helen Rowe and Mark Fisher (appellants) brought an unlawful detainer action seeking a forfeiture and default of a 10-year lease, alleging defendant and respondent Wells Fargo Realty Services, Inc. (Wells Fargo), 1 the lessee, committed waste and used the leased premises for an unlawful purpose. This appeal is from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo. We affirm.
Statement of Facts
On July 1, 1976, Wells Fargo, as lessee, entered into a 10-year commercial lease with appellants’ predecessor in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- C. L. Smith Co. v. Roger Ducharme, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Keating v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Smith v. Cap Concrete, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Sinnamon v. McKayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Lituchy v. LathersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robinson v. Hewlett-Packard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Nazar v. RodefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Avalon Pacific-Santa Ana, L.P. v. HD Supply Repair & Remodel, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Dieterich International Truck Sales, Inc. v. J. S. & J. Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- 12 Havemeyer Place Co., LLC v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.