Legal Opinion
Nazar v. Rodeffer
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 18, 1986No. B013721PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J.
Plaintiff Robert Nazar, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants E. O. Rodeffer, dba Rodeffer Investments, and Dewain R. Butler. Summary judgment was predicated on Civil Code section 846 which immunizes landowners from liability for negligence to persons who enter their property for recreation without express invitation and without payment of a fee. 1
On April 13, 1983, plaintiff was injured in a motorcycle accident that occurred on real property owned by defendants and located immediately west of the 605 Freeway and south of Beverly Boulevard.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Delta Farms Reclamation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Gray v. ReevesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Barnett v. Delta Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ornelas v. RandolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Calvillo-Silva v. Home GroceryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Aguimatang v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.