Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Arpaia v. Alexander

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 27, 1946No. Civ. No. 1867PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

This is a habeas corpus action, brought to test the legality of the confinement of the petitioner in the Federal Correctional Institution at Danbury in this District under a judgment of conviction for violation of the Selective Service Act entered by this Court. 54 Stat. 894, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 311. Petitioner was convicted on trial to the Court of refusing to obey a lawful order of the Selective Service Board in refusing to be inducted into the armed services. On the trial, evidence bearing upon the validity of the classification of the petitioner by the Board was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Goff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  5. United States Ex Rel. Hull v. StalterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AlviesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. United States v. KahlDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API