Legal Opinion
Etienne v. Wolverine Tube, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 2, 1998No. 98-2010-JWLPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
By this diversity action, plaintiff seeks damages for breach of an employment contract. The matter is presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of venue, and failure to state a claim, or alternatively for transfer of venue (Doc. 7). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the motion in its entirety.
I. Background 1
Plaintiff is a Kansas resident. Defendant is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Alabama. In July 1997, plaintiff contacted defendant about a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. StallworthDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Helsel v. TISHMAN REALTY & CONST. CO., INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Mohr v. Margolis, Ainsworth & Kinlaw Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.