Legal Opinion
Doe v. Saracyn Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 3, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
Gerald Doe and his wife, Marie, joined in this action to recover damages for personal injuries occasioned, they alleged, by the unlawful acts of the Saracyn Corporation and Edward C. Sterling. *71During the course of the trial Doe dropped Sterling as a party. The jury returned a defendants’ verdict in Mrs. Doe’s action. Comment on her appeal will be postponed until after disposition of the appeal taken by the Saracyn Corporation from the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict in favor of Doe and from the judgment entered thereon. We refer to Doe as the plaintiff and to the corporation as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Consolidated Ice Machine Co. v. KeiferIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Radwick v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Hoffman Wall Paper Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McKirdy v. CascioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Petrizzo v. Commercial Contractors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Boland v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Giambartolomei v. Rocky DeCarlo & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Cummings v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.