Legal Opinion

Smithey v. Robertson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1924No. 2164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; John C. Rose, Judge. Suit in equity by Marvin Smithey against Thomas E. Robertson, Commissioner of Patents. Decree dismissing bill, and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland entered on the 9th day of February, 1923, dismissing complainant’s bill.

The bill was filed pursuant to the provisions of section 4915 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, as amended by the Act of February 9, 1893 (section 4915 R. S.; Comp. Stat. § 9460; amended act, section 9456, Comp. Stat., 27 Stat. 436), praying that the complainant be adjudged by the court entitled to a patent for his invention particularly specified in his claims, notwithstanding the fact that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Fenton Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Brinkerhoff v. AloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Gas Machinery Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  2. In re LudwickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  3. Johnson v. Duquesne Light Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API