Gas Machinery Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; William U. Day, Judge. Suit in equity by the United Gas Improvement Company against the Gas Machinery Company. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; William U. Day, Judge. Suit in equity by the United Gas Improvement Company against the Gas Machinery Company. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals. In an infringement suit brought by the United Gas Improvement Company against the Gas Machinery Company, based upon patent No. 857,760, issued June 25,1907, to Rusby, and patent No. 940,925 issued to Dickey, November 23, 1909, both for “improvements in water gas apparatus,” the court below found for complainant upon the Rusby…
1Opinion of the CourtDenison, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1] Whether it was invention to take the ajutage from a pipe leading to an exhauster, which is one kind of an air pump, and put it on a pipe leading from a blower, which is another kind of an air pump, or to take it from a pipe carrying gas from a gas holder and put it on a pipe carrying an element of the gas on its way into the gas holder, is, to say the least, a question of doubt; but this case may be more clearly, as we think, disposed of on another ground. We conclude that the relation of Rusby’s ajutage and gauge to the “set” is the relation between…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lyman Mfg. Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1944
- Jackson Fence Co. v. Peerless Wire Fence Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. SeiberlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. MeinkenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.