Legal Opinion
Strauss v. United Telegram Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 21, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
This is an action of contract, in eighteen counts, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the interest alleged to be due on eighteen five-hundred-dollar bonds of the defendant corporation, on January and July 1, 1893, and on January 1, 1894. The plaintiff is not the person to whom the bonds were originally issued, but he is a holder for value, and is also a registered holder. The bonds are under seal, are signed by the president and secretary of the corporation, and are of the following tenor :
“ Know all men by these presents, that the United Telegram Company, a corporation duly organized…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. Vermont & Massachusetts RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Society for Savings v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarlorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Haven v. Grand Junction Railroad & Depot Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Marlor v. Texas & P. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morgan Bros. v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Zuckerman v. BlakeleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Gilbert v. Beacon Hill Credit UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Pima Farms Co. v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.