Legal Opinion
State v. Snapp
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1987No. 16694PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
We are asked to decide whether two prison sentences imposed for sexual abuse of children should be reduced under I.C.R. 35. Our examination of this issue also requires us to consider the problem of parole eligibility where consecutive sentences have been imposed.
The appeal comes to us with the following procedural history. Lynn C. Snapp was convicted by a jury on three counts of sexual abuse. Each count represented a felony under I.C. § 18-1506. On two of the counts, Snapp received indeterminate sentences of five years each, to be served consecutively. 1 On the third count, he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. Louis Distasio, Sr., United States of America v. Jerry J. DistasioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- State v. TorresIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. PriestIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. ShiloffIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CrostonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MartinsenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. BeateyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.