Legal Opinion

Leominster Materials Corp. v. Board of Leominster

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 7, 1997No. 96-P-850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

The principal issue raised by this appeal is the *459proper interpretation of a zoning ordinance of the city of Le-ominster (city) governing the removal of certain earth products. The plaintiff, Leominster Materials Corporation (LMC), appeals from a decision of the city’s zoning board of appeals (board), issued pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 8, upholding the interpretation of the zoning ordinance of the city made by the director of inspections (director). The director’s interpretation of the ordinance led to a determination that the plaintiff’s use of its land for excavation and removal of stone and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John B. Deary, Inc. v. CraneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  2. Board of Selectmen of Hatfield v. GarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Town of Harvard v. MaxantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Foster v. Mayor of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. S. Volpe & Co. v. Board of Appeals of WarehamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petrucci v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. McGovern Physical Therapy Associates, LLC v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API