Federal Savings & Insurance v. Rager
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.
This was an action by the administrator of Frank H. Puthoff, deceased, upon a policy of insurance issued by appellant to said Frank H. Puthoff, providing indemnity against loss of life by accident.
To a complaint in one paragraph, the appellant filed answer in two paragraphs, the first being a general denial, and the second admitting partial liability, and rely*296ing upon a clause in said policy which, was as follows, to wit: “If. the injuries, whether fatal or nonfatal * * * are caused wholly or in part from voluntary exposure to unnecessary danger or obvious risk of injury, * * * then, in all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Union Casualty v. HarrollTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Burkhard v. Travellers' Insurance Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n v. SpringsteenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- King v. ColemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LinnIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Nelson County v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WhitmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922