Legal Opinion

ANN MARGARET WILLIAMS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2016No. SD34223PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

OPINION AUTHOR

Ann Margaret Williams (“Movant”) was convicted after a jury trial in 2011 for promoting prostitution in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree. See sections 567.050 and 568.045. 1 Movant now appeals the “judgment” denying her amended motion for post-conviction relief (“the amended motion”) after an evidentiary hearing. See Rule 29.15(k). Her sole point claims the motion, court erred, in finding her trial counsel not ineffective for “failing to make an offer of proof when the trial court sustained objections to questioning about appellant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. John Childers v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Rogers v. Hester Ex Rel. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Lawrence Frazee v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graves v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API