Legal Opinion

Oaks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Williams Oaks (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), which had awarded Claimant partial disability benefits calculated on a quarterly averaged basis, rather than on a weekly or biweekly basis. The problem presented seems to be one of first impression.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. On June 25, 1988, Claimant suffered a right wrist sprain and, pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable, he began to receive benefits at a rate of $377.00 per week. 1 On March 19, 1989,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Stofa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Jones v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Powell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Community Dialysis Center)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API