In re Natalie S.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtEveleigh, J.
**851 The respondent mother in the underlying case, Heather S. (mother), appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying *1191 her motion for visitation with the minor child, Natalie S. On appeal to this court, the mother asserts that the trial court incorrectly determined that North Carolina was the appropriate forum to adjudicate the issues raised in her motion for visitation. The respondent father, Matthew B. (father), asserts that the trial court properly denied the mother's motion for visitation on the ground that North Carolina is the more appropriate forum to decide the issues raised…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Collins v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rockwell v. RockwellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Com. v. Sensenig, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018