Legal Opinion

Rockwell v. Rockwell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 5, 2017No. AC38512PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElgo, J.

In this vexatious litigation action, the self-represented plaintiff, James W. Rockwell, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant Attorney Ian A. Cole. 1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) improperly bifurcated trial of the issue of probable cause from the issues of malice and damages, (2) violated his right to a jury trial and (3) improperly determined that the defendant had probable cause to prosecute the underlying action. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The genesis of the present dispute is a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferri v. Powell-FerriConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. Rockwell v. RockwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API