County of Los Angeles v. Dodge
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. J. Hill, County Counsel, Edward T. Bishop, Assistant County Counsel, J. H. O'Connor, Deputy County Counsel, and Jess E. Stephens, for Petitioners.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
These proceedings were instituted to compel the respondent Dodge, as chairman of the board of supervisors of the county of Los Angeles, and the respondent Snyder, as mayor of the city of Los Angeles, to execute a certain lease on behalf, respectively, of the two bodies politic, the board of supervisors of the one and the city council of the other having ordered such execution, and the respondents having refused to obey the orders. The petitions in the two proceedings allege the same facts and the return in each is identical with that in the other. These returns are in the form of general…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Worden v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Daggett v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Harter v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hutcheson v. AthertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Glendale v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Martin v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.