Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 27, 2010No. 30, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

In this case, we consider whether petitioner was prejudiced by the admission in his second trial of videotaped testimony by a deceased witness despite her statement to the police, unknown to petitioner during his initial trial, that she was “legally blind.” We shall hold that the State failed to meet its discovery obligations under the Maryland rules, and that *674petitioner was prejudiced when the Circuit Court for Baltimore City received the witness’s videotaped previous trial testimony into evidence at his second trial. Accordingly, we shall reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

This case arises…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bielanski v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Beka Industries, Inc. v. Worcester County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Correll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. DULYX v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API