Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2007No. 0301-00495; CA A125823; SC S52741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This is an action for damages due to personal injury. Plaintiff was a passenger on a bus operated by defendant Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (TriMet). Plaintiff claims that he suffered injuries when a “phantom vehicle” (a legal term that we discuss below) caused the bus in which he was riding to brake sharply, resulting in his injury. The trial court granted summary judgment for TriMet, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Wilson v. Tri-County Metro. Trans. Dist., 200 Or App 291, 114 P3d 1157 (2005). On review, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. To v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Turlay v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Wilson v. TRI-COUNTY METRO. TRANSP. DIST.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API