Legal Opinion

Mid-Century Insurance v. Perkins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2008No. CC 04-1834-E7; CA A127522; SC S054652; CC 0504-03584; CA A130265; SC S054660PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

We consolidate in this opinion our review of two actions for the recovery of underinsured motorist (UIM) insurance benefits. In Mid-Century Ins. Co. v. Perkins, 209 Or App 613, 149 P3d 265 (2006), the Court of Appeals reversed a trial court order allowing the insured to recover UIM benefits. In Phillips v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Oregon, 209 Or App 815, 149 P3d 316 (2006), the Court of Appeals affirmed an order denying recovery of UIM benefits. Both cases center on the interpretation of ORS 742.502(2)(a) in light of this court’s decision in Bergmann v. Hutton, 337 Or 596, 101 P3d 353 (2004). We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Holloway v. Republic Indem. Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Vogelin v. American Family Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Thoens v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Batten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API