Legal Opinion

Rockland Mutual Insurance v. Commissioner of Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 28, 1971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

The petitioner (Rockland.) seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the commissioner to amend Rock-land’s certificate of authority (see G. L. c. 175, § 32, as amended through St. 1941, c. 342, § 1; see fn. 3, infra) or, in the alternative, to acknowledge by a published ruling that Rockland is authorized (without such an amendment) to transact certain lines of insurance business. See G. L. c. 175, § 113C, as amended through St. 1971, c. 520, § 1.

The pleadings and a stipulation establish the following facts. Rockland is a mutual insurance company incorporated in Massachusetts. It is presently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Elmer v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Berman v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Commissioner of Insurance v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Multi-Line Insurance Rating Bureau v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Gordon v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Andover Savings Bank v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Hahn v. SargentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API