Legal Opinion

Reeser v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1930No. 19647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

The defendant! in error herein} as plaintiff, brought this suit against .the plaintiff in error herein, as defendant, for the recovery of a broker’s commission for selling an undivided interest in certain oil and gas royalties on land situated in Seminole county, Okla. In accordance with plaintiff’s contract of sale with the defendant, he entered into a sales contract with the Accumulative Royalties Corporation, as purchaser, which was as follows:

“December 10, 1927.
“The Accumulative' Royalties Corporation agrees to purchase from E. I. Reeser, and the said E. I. Reeser hereby agrees to deliver…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huntley v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ikeoka v. KongHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Franklin P. Smith and John S. Adams v. Gibraltar Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. Sanders v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. McKemie v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Ikeoka v. KongHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API