Legal Opinion
Kingston v. Busch
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1913No. Docket No. 22PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Bill by Samuel R. Kingston and others against Charles A. Busch and another for an injunction. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
The bill of complaint in this cause is filed to enjoin defendants from erecting upon a certain lot “any building other than a single dwelling house intended for the occupancy of one family.”
The restriction in the deeds running to complainants is as follows:
“That said premises shall be used for residence purposes only; that no dwelling house shall be erected thereon at a cost of less than $2,000; and that no building or part of building shall be erected on said premises within 15 feet from the front or Josephine avenue line of said premises.”
*567The restriction contained in the deed to defendants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Harris v. RorabackMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- James v. IrvineMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Tillotson v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Bagnall v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Seeley v. Phi Sigma Delta House Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Phillips v. LawlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- De Galan v. BarakMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Walker v. HaslettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.