Purcell v. Purcell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Unless the finding be materially corrected it cannot reasonably be claimed that the judgment was not properly rendered for the defendant.
The plaintiff seeks to have the finding corrected by exceptions taken to certain facts found, and to the failure to find certain facts as requested by her; and the testimony given by each of the parties has been duly made a part of the record to aid in securing these corrections. An examination of the evidence printed fails to disclose that the court found any fact without evidence, or that it failed to find any material facts which were admitted or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McEvoy v. McEvoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Vanguilder v. VanguilderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Bagdan v. BagdanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Palmer v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Doe v. DoeConnecticut Superior Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.