Murphy v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The complaint alleged in one count that the defendant at the date of the marriage was, and ever since has been, subject to a permanent incurable corporal defect which rendered sexual intercourse impossible, which she at all times previous to the mar riage concealed from the plaintiff, and that the marriage has never been fully consummated. In a second count it alleged that the defendant had been guilty of intolerable cruelty to the plaintiff. The court found the existence of a corporal defect rendering sexual intercourse impossible, and this finding, though attacked, must be sustained, since…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- McEvoy v. McEvoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Morehouse v. MorehouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Swist v. SwistSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Behrmann v. BehrmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Yovino v. BIG BUBBA'S BBQ, LLCConnecticut Superior Court · 2006
- Fraher v. FraherConnecticut Superior Court · 1937
- McCurry v. McCurryConnecticut Superior Court · 1939