Chesney v. McClintock
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
The petitioner prays for the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, W. S. McClintock, a justice of the peace of the city of Topeka, to assume jurisdiction of and to try an action brought before him on May 18, 1899, wherein the plaintiff in the action has sued on a money demand in an amount exceeding one dollar. The justice of the peace refused to entertain jurisdiction of the cause for the reason that, by section 2, chapter 129,-Laws of 1899, justices of the peace in said city have *95been deprived of jurisdiction in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. FrancisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Comm'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Darling v. RodgersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Rathbone v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- In re GreerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Rambo v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- State ex rel. Godard v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Cumpton v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. SimonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.