Legal Opinion
In Re Fuqua Industries, Inc. Shareholder Litigation
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided December 2, 1999No. Civil Action 11974PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHANDLER, Chancellor.
In the eighth year of this protracted derivative litigation, defendants deposed the two derivative plaintiffs in whose names this litigation is prosecuted, Virginia Abrams and Alan Freberg. In the course of the depositions, defendants determined that Abrams and Freberg were unfamiliar with many of the facts and allegations involved in this lawsuit. Defern dants now point to plaintiffs’ alleged unfamiliarity and ask this Court to disqualify Abrams and Freberg because they cannot adequately and fairly protect the interests of Fuqua Industries, Inc. and its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- G. A. Enterprises, Inc. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Hernandez v. United Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Youngman v. TahmoushCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- South ex rel. Hecla Mining Co. v. BakerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
- In re Southern Peru Copper Corp. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2011
- In re Sauer-Danfoss Inc. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2011
- In Re Revlon, Inc. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
- Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.