Rita M. Anderson v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and in-junctive relief and for review of a decision of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD. Jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1361. The district court denied relief and dismissed the action. We affirm.
Plaintiff-appellant Rita M. Anderson mortgaged her Denver, Colorado, home to defendant-appellee Utah Mortgage Loan Corporation, Utah. Defendant-appellant HUD insured payment under 12 U.S.C. § 1709, referred to in the briefs as the “§ 203 Program.” The original amount of the mortgage was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- American Petroleum Institute v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Secretary of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cf&i Steel Corporation, a Colorado Corporation v. Economic Development AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Colorado Health Care Ass'n v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Thomas Brooks Chartered, a Professional Corporation v. James Burnett, Norman Wiemeyer, and the National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- United States v. East River Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.