Legal Opinion

Palatine Insurance v. Dickenson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Spence. Decatur superior court. May 15, 1902. •

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

1. Where a bill of exceptions sets forth rulings made in a case to which the “Palatine Insurance Company Limited, of Manchester, England,” was a party, and exceptions thereto are taken in the name of the “Palatine Insurance Co.,” the writ of error will not be dismissed as having been sued out by one not a party to the case below. The variance is not a substantial one, and, further than this, the second name evidently refers back and relates to the full corporate name first stated in the bill of exceptions.

2. A policy of fire-insurance which expressly stipulates that.it shall be void “if the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williamson v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ramey v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Robinson v. Reward Ceramic Color Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Security Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Blackstock v. Jefferson Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Parramore v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API