Legal Opinion

People v. Rhodus

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 14, 1994No. 93SC29PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

We granted certiorari to review People v. Rhodus, 852 P.2d 1280 (Colo.App.1992). In Rhodus, the court of appeals ordered a new trial because of the trial judge’s decision to deny defense counsel’s challenge of a juror for cause. The question before us is whether a county official whose office, by statutory mandate, is represented by the prosecutor should be excluded from serving on a jury because the county official is implicitly bi*472ased.1 We answer the question in the negative. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the court of appeals with directions to reinstate the judgment of conviction…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Pharo v. Chambers County, Tex.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carrillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. People v. LefebreSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API