Legal Opinion

Nussbaum v. Garstaff Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrisach, J.

Plaintiff is a tenant at No. 976 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York, He brings this action against the defendant Garstaff Realty Co. Inc. (hereafter called Garstaff) and a new tenant of another store at No. 968 Southern Boulevard, Jane Ardsley Frocks Inc., hereinafter called Ardsley, for an injunction. Plaintiff seeks to restrain Garstaff from leasing and Ardsley from selling or offering for sale in its store any and all ladies’ sportswear, blouses, skirts, hosiery, underwear, accessories and general dry goods.

The building in which plaintiff’s store is located has nine stores extending from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaulang Realty Co. v. DyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
  2. 50 Broad Street, Inc. v. KnoblochAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
  3. Ottavino v. AuricchioNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API