Legal Opinion

Ottavino v. Auricchio

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1951Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

Defendants have moved for an order “ vacating and setting aside and declaring that * * * [a certain] - order for a final injunction is null and void and without legal effect ”.

Despite the relief requested in the notice of motion, as noted above, it is clear from the papers before the court that the relief really sought by the defendants is in effect to have the injunctive provisions of a judgment discharged of record on the ground of performance. Such relief may be obtained by motion. (Haubrich v. Haubrich, 180 Misc. 735, appeal dismissed, 267 App. Div. 872; Brinn v. Wooding, 164 Misc. 850; 2…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Rabinovitz v. WilliamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Haubrich v. HaubrichNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Nussbaum v. Garstaff Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Brinn v. WoodingCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API