Legal Opinion

50 Broad Street, Inc. v. Knobloch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 5, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The omnibus order appealed from is modified in the following respects: The landlords ’ motion to strike this cause from the jury calendar is granted. The jury waiver provision applies to this proceeding instituted by the landlords to recover possession of the tenant’s space pursuant to section 8 (subd. [gg], par. [1]) of the Business Bent Law (Klipack v. Raymar Novelties, 273 App. Div. 54; Stephenson v. 30 Fifth Ave., 1 A D 2d 469).

Landlords’ motion to strike out the second affirmative defense is granted. In a holdover proceeding brought pursuant to section 8 (subd. [gg], par. [1]) of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klipack v. Raymar Novelties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  2. Nussbaum v. Garstaff Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gansvoort Apartments, Inc. v. DroutmanNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Rappaport v. Raylen Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. W. E. Cramer Pharmacy, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  2. Ten Fifth Avenue Corp. v. BakerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API