Vollmer v. Village of Amherst
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In our judgment the decision of this case hinges on the question of estoppel. Assuredly the bonds and mortgage were not absolutely void. On the other hand several irregularities are claimed but all but two may be dismissed without further consideration. The two that must be noticed are: (a) The method by which the bonds were sold and (b) the issuance thereof before the lapse of thirty days after the passage of the ordinance on July 8, 1939, authorizing them, which period must transpire before the ordinance could become effective. City of Middletown v. City Commission, 138 Ohio St., 596, 37 N.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- City of Middletown v. City CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Warfield v. Anglo & London Paris National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Fahey v. Town of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Alden Corp. v. Village of SolonOhio Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brooks v. Village of CanfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1972