Brooks v. Village of Canfield
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLyNch, J.
Plaintiff, Robert E. Brooks, and defendant Village of Canfield, appellants herein, are separately appealing the decision of the trial court which dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, which requested an injunction compelling defendant Cook Chevrolet, Inc., to remove a sign erected in front of their business establishment. The sign allegedly was in excess of the maximum total sign area as set forth in Section 1133.09 (b) (2 and 3) of the Canfield planning and zoning code.. The sign is a General Motors Dealer identification sign, 92 square feet in dimension, containing commercial lettering on both…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co. v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- State, Ex Rel. Cook v. TurgeonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- McVey v. ReichleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Connelly v. MorrisCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1954
- Schenker v. ZegiobOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Westgate Shopping Village v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Village of MayfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ameigh v. Baycliffs Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Pacific Data Systems, Inc. v. Guam Department of Education, Teleguam Holdings LLC dba GTA, Defendant-Intervenor-AppellantSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
- Ameigh v. Baycliffs Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998