State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Duncan
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 We are asked, in this special action, to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion by failing to order a prescreening psychological expert to independently determine the defendant’s intelligence quotient (“IQ”). 1 We find that the court properly appointed an expert to conduct a prescreen-ing examination, but erred when it limited that examination to a review of prior tests.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Joel Randu Escalant'e-Orozco (“Defendant”) was indicted on one count of first-degree murder, two counts of sexual assault, and one count of first-degree…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Eric BoystonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Smith v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Smith v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016