Legal Opinion
Hart v. Keoveney
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided April 11, 1980PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
This case originated as an action in tort for abuse of process. It has never been tried on the merits. The motion judge in the District Court division allowed a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 60 motion filed by the defendant to set aside a default judgment, apparently on the ground that the defendant had never received notice of the ■action. The judge also passed on the plaintiffs requests for rulings of law, which requests related solely to the Rule 60 motion, and took no action on requests for findings of fact filed by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff then filed a request for a report which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Albano v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arciero v. Eagle Realty Associates, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
- Brooks v. HautalaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
- Pleasant Travel, Inc. v. ButlerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
- Price-Hanson v. PareMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
- Onessimo v. CarvelliMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.