Legal Opinion

Rochon Corp. v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 2013No. A12-1491Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s refusal to award attorney fees and litigation costs incurred after it successfully challenged respondent-city’s bidding process for a municipal-contracting project. Appellant was awarded the full costs of its bid submission as allowed under the Minnesota Uniform Municipal Contracting Law (the UMCL). Because the UMCL unambiguously prohibits the award of attorney fees under these circumstances, we decline to adopt appellant’s argument that it is entitled to attorney fees and costs under Minnesota’s private attorney general statute.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API