Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Mastrangelo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 28, 1981No. 257, Docket 81-1270PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

This expedited appeal raises anew the question whether there was “manifest necessity,” United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 579, 580, 6 L.Ed. 165 (1824), for the declaration of a mistrial. What makes this case unique is that the mistrial was declared following the killing of the Government’s only witness against appellant, Richard Mastrangelo. The killing occurred on the witness’s way to the courtroom to testify in a trial in which the Government’s case against the eodefendant, Joseph Dazzo, was essentially complete. The United States District Court for the Eastern…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard MastrangeloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Angelo Ruggiero, Gene Gotti and John CarnegliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. CastellanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. United States v. Claddis Arrington, Brooks Gregory Davis, Mary Ferguson Davis, and Wayne DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API