Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1994PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether manifest necessity required the trial court to declare a mistrial in the defendants’ trial for felony murder and armed robbery. If so, the defendants could be retried without violating the double jeopardy clauses of the Tennessee and United States Constitutions. After concluding that there was a distinct possibility of defense attorney misconduct affecting the trial, the trial court determined that manifest necessity existed requiring it to declare a mistrial. When the State sought a retrial, the defendants moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State of Tennessee v. Joey DeWayne ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. NashTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. WatsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. State v. ConwayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API