Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 26, 1988No. 05-87-00595-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWE, Justice.

Melvin Eugene Thomas was found guilty before a jury of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft. The jury set enhanced punishment at 75 years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. On appeal appellant brings six points of error, summarized as follows: insufficient evidence of intent to commit theft; denials of constitutional “due course” and “due process” from the utilization of the “appellate presumption” of intent to commit theft from nighttime entry; and denial of constitutional rights by the court’s instruction on parole. We overrule all points and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re A.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Wilkerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. Mott v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Matter of As, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
  5. Donald Wayne Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API