Legal Opinion

Nichols v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1994No. 2-92-486-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATTIMORE, Justice.

Appellant Claude Daniel Nichols was convicted by a jury of the offense of driving while intoxicated. See Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 6701Z-1 (Vernon Supp.1994). The jury assessed punishment at two years in jail probated for two years and a fine of $2,000. On appeal Nichols raises three points of error contending: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction; and (2) — (3) the trial judge erred in admitting into evidence testimony resulting from an unlawful search and seizure under the Texas Constitution and laws and the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hogan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  2. Farhat v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. Wise v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Michael Ray Bonds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. David Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API