Farhat v. State

OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Samuel David Farhat appeals his conviction for the Class B misdemean- or offense of driving while intoxicated (DWI). In a single point, Farhat argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress blood evidence seized with a warrant. Farhat argues that the affidavit underlying the search warrant is insufficient because it did not provide the magistrate with a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed, that he was intoxicated. We will reverse and remand.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 11,…