Legal Opinion

Committee to Impose Term Limits on the Ohio Supreme Court & to Preclude Special Legal Status for Members & Employees of the Ohio General Assembly v. Ohio Ballot Board

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 3, 2016No. Case No. 2:16-cv-1030PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs move for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Doc. 2). Plaintiffs want to put a two-part constitutional amendment on the ballot by way of Ohio’s initiative process. Ohio prohibits anyone from proposing to its voters a mul-ti-part amendment or law. Ohio tasked the Ohio Ballot Board with enforcing this rule. Plaintiffs sued the Ohio Ballot Board and its members (and Ohio’s Attorney General), alleging that Ohio’s restriction is an unconstitutional restraint on free speech.

I) Background

There are four…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmitt v. Ohio Sec'y of State Jon HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API