Committee to Impose Term Limits on the Ohio Supreme Court & to Preclude Special Legal Status for Members & Employees of the Ohio General Assembly v. Ohio Ballot Board
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs move for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Doc. 2). Plaintiffs want to put a two-part constitutional amendment on the ballot by way of Ohio’s initiative process. Ohio prohibits anyone from proposing to its voters a mul-ti-part amendment or law. Ohio tasked the Ohio Ballot Board with enforcing this rule. Plaintiffs sued the Ohio Ballot Board and its members (and Ohio’s Attorney General), alleging that Ohio’s restriction is an unconstitutional restraint on free speech.
I) Background
There are four…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schmitt v. Ohio Sec'y of State Jon HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018