Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Sheldon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 1929No. 18455PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
This action copies to this court on appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county, wherein the state of Oklahoma, on relation of Edwin Dabney, Attorney General of said state, commenced an action in the district court of Oklahoma county to remove the defendant in 'error, Ed Sheldon, from office, under and by virtue of the terms and provisions of the first subdivision of section 2413, C. O. S. 1921, commonly known as the Attorney General’s Bill. And, as the parties hold the same position in this court as in the-trial court, they will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant. ¡'
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- H. Hackfeld & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Holliday v. Fields, GovernorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Folsom v. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Case v. PinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Murray v. BozarthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- State Ex Rel. v. PeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Dabney v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- State ex rel. Dabney v. PeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929