Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Butterfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1929No. 18456Published

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

The pleadings in this case are identical with those in the companion case of State of Oklahoma ex rel. Edwin Dabney, Attorney General, v. Ed Sheldon, No. 18455, this day decided, with the exception of the name of the defendant, Ed But-terfield.

Under the authority of No. 18455, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Edwin Dabney, Attorney General, v. Ed Sheldon, this day decided, 135 Okla. 278, 276 Pac. 468, this cause is remanded to the district court of Oklahoma county, with directions to overrule the demurrer and motion of the defendant, Ed Butterfield, as to paragraphs 1, 3, and 4, and to take such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Dabney v. SheldonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API